Raheem Sterling wouldn’t be the pantomime villain if he was white

The knives have been out for Raheem Sterling ever since he joined Manchester City.

The club splashed out £44 million to Liverpool for his services in the summer of 2015 and it made the winger one of the most expensive signings in English football. It was one of the biggest transfer tussles, as the Merseyside club refused to budge on their valuation, while City were very wary of overspending having been stung under Financial Fair Play Regulations in the past.

Eventually, the deal went through and ever since Sterling has been booed up and down the country. Despite having no connection to the vast majority of City’s opposition – he came through the youth set-up at Queens Park Rangers before joining Liverpool for an initial £600k in 2010 – the 22-year-old takes the brunt of most fans’ anger wherever he goes.

Already this season, he’s notably been jeered throughout City’s 4-1 victory at Stoke in August and their 2-1 success at Burnley in November. Meanwhile, there have been many sets of supporters that have derided his every touch of the ball from the away end of the Etihad.

Why? Surely the only sets of fans with any recourse to do that are Liverpool’s? He left the club under a cloud, having turned down a reportedly high contract offer from them – though he did it because he believes it will improve his chances of success in the long term.

Already this season, Sterling has proved himself to be a key man in City’s team under Pep Guardiola. He has been far more impressive for his side when switched to the right flank, a position he barely occupied under Manuel Pellegrini, and he’s been one of the biggest attacking threats in the side. He commented that the former manager’s style was stifling his ability – and now he’s able to play more freely, he’s been on fire.

The winger is creating key chances – in the 5-0 battering of West Ham, he was causing chaos in the home side’s box every time he got on the ball and he was unlucky not to have scored the second goal.

The England international should have been given a penalty as he was clearly felled in the Everton area during the 4-0 loss at Goodison Park – and it came at a time that a successful spot-kick would have changed the game.

But that raises another issue that weaves into the Sterling narrative; he has to do more to be fouled. Most attackers who are shouldered off the ball get a free kick, more often than not Sterling isn’t and he’s expected to be stronger. Opposition fans then jeer him again as he stands up from his hefty challenge, while the likes of David Silva or Kevin De Bruyne will be putting the ball down for a free kick.

Sterling created the chance for Sergio Aguero to score in the 2-1 home victory over Burnley (though he should have scored himself instead of tripping over when one-on-one with the goalkeeper).

He won the penalty that broke the deadlock in the 3-0 win at Hull on Boxing Day, causing panic by running at the Tigers’ defence.

He also scored the winner against Arsenal, as City came from behind to win 2-1 just before Christmas.

All of this flies in the face of the narrative that seems to be forming around the winger – or, at least, one that many seem to want to form. It’s more of a story if Sterling fails, especially for the money that was paid out on him, but this seems to run a lot deeper than the tale of a good old “high-profile flop”.

Chants of “you let your country down” from the Burnley fans earlier this season were frankly baffling – none of the England team that represented their country in an awful Euro 2016 campaign last summer did themselves proud, yet Sterling is the fall guy for that miserable tournament.

The likes of Adam Lallana, Jordan Henderson, Eric Dier, Harry Kane or Wayne Rooney all get off scot-free. Were any of them any better? Hardly.

Straight after that tournament, Sterling was hammered in the national press for spending his money. He was then hammered in January 2017 for shopping in a budget store – a story that made it to press despite the photograph sparking it being two-and-a-half years old. Whatever he does, Sterling can’t win.

For the record, that house he was “showing off” was bought for his mother – who had helped and supported him from a young age after they moved to London from Jamaica and who he wants to help because of all she had done for him and his career.

Sterling is a footballer who understands his market value, and who wants to achieve the best he can. He didn’t leave Liverpool out of disrespect, but to better himself – and he’ll do the same to City if the opportunity to move to the next level comes up.

He’s been lynched by the press and opposition fans for wanting to reach the top of his game; is there something that rankles with the idea of a young black man becoming successful?

If this really were about his performances for the national team in the last European Championships, then it wouldn’t have started in the 2015/16 season. The jeers and taunts would have also been aimed at some of the other England players from the disastrous campaign in France.

If this were solely about a young player taking a big transfer to another club, then John Stones would get it in the neck, too – but there’s often barely a noise when the ex-Everton centre-half gets on the ball for City, save for the game at Goodison Park. Compare that to the decibel level when Sterling takes possession.

In a world that likes to believe the problem of racism is long gone, it’s difficult not to feel like there are racial undertones to the abuse Sterling receives, even if it’s not overt.

It’s time to ask why so many opponents decide to give the winger grief. Perhaps the answer isn’t as comfortable as we’d like to think.

Written by David Mooney

Typical City is funded by the readers via our Patreon page. Please consider funding us with $1 a month so we can continue to operate as we are now. Thank you in advance.

Follow Typical City on Twitter and Like on Facebook

READ ALSO:

Pep’s pushovers were an embarrassment at Everton

It’s time for Claudio Bravo to sit down

HALCYON DIGEST: Mike Sheron & Everton away, 1992

, ,
5 comments on “Raheem Sterling wouldn’t be the pantomime villain if he was white
  1. David Mooney, thank you for the article… sometime a controversial headline is what it takes to get people to notice…
    @CMACCA ; that is the thing with racism… it is quite nuanced that no one really has real proof… Stone/Gerrard you say/Lampard etc will never get the same level of abuse: this is what we here (in America) call white privilege: let me explain… Joey Barton is the perfect example of white privilege… I see Joey Barton get invited to the BBC to talk about (fill in the blank) that idiot is a convicted criminal, a thug (he cowardly assaulted Ousmane Dabo for god sakes), and has no talent… yet he gets the benefit of the doubt all the time… including being invited on the national stage (BBC, talksports) i promise you that helped him secure a deal at Burnley for himself… so you sincerely believe that Sterling or any other black player will be afforded these many chances… look at Balotelli, he is an idiot yes but hardly a criminal yet he gets it all the time no matter how well he does or does not do (no one talks about that fact that he takes care his extended family that abandoned him in a hospital)… instead, whenever Balotelli is mentioned we are reminded of the bathroom fireworks (which was debunked by the way; it was a friend of his brother that set off the firework while he was asleep)… are we ever reminded of Joey Barton’s crimes and prison term?… it is as if it hasn’t happened; every one wants to give the lad a chance because he can change… that is what we call “white privilege”

  2. What an incredibly narrow minded and stupid headline you’ve chosen here. Top players get booed all the time, Rooney most grounds he’s ever been too, players such as Lampard and Gerrard took countless stick. Even the average player taking a throw in or corner is subjected to gestures and abuse. It’s an awful side to the game which happens in all tiers of English football. Where is your evidence of said racism? You are essentially going on a supposed undertone with nothing to back it up whatsoever.

    • Liverpool fans are the only fans who have a legitimate reason to dislike Sterling (although his move to City was objectively a good career move at the time, but that’s another conversation altogether) but he gets abuse everywhere he goes and though booing him isn’t a racist act in itself, it’s difficult not to feel like there’s a simmering racist undercurrent to it.

      It’s often the less cosmopolitan areas of the country, like Stoke and Burnley, where he gets it in the neck the most but he’s also been racially abused on Instagram before and the tabloid newspapers have treated him appallingly at times (The Sun called him a “football idiot” for having the temerity to buy his mother a house). He didn’t cover himself in glory at the European Championships but then nobody did, and compare the way he’s treated to the way John Stones is, for example. Both players left the clubs they were at to join City in big money moves yet it’s only the black lad who gets abused. A lot of racism takes place at a sub-conscious level (think about the amount of flak Sterling’s got for the fact he has several children) and it seems our national psyche can’t come to terms with a young, black man being rich and successful.

      All we’re asking is that you consider, in an age of Brexit and Donald Trump, that racism is still a big problem in football and society and might be a factor here. What is it about the conversation that makes you so uncomfortable? What have you got to lose?

      • I haven’t seen his Instagram and that is horrendous if he’s getting racist abuse. As for the sun Jesus they slag most top English players off at some point in their career! Not nice but happens.

        The conversation doesn’t make me feel uncomfortable about discussing, I wouldn’t dare suggest that there isn’t racism still occurring in football, but I would put it to you that you have no solid evidence to back up this claim, and are simply going on assumptions

  3. Excellent David and sadly I think there maybe some truth in what you say. Let’s hope one day the boo boys can actually appreciate Raheems skill and not pre judge him because of their failings as a human being.

Make a Comment

%d bloggers like this: